Astute political and legal observers suggest that Mr. Armstrong is afraid to appear in person due to the fact that he and his client may be grilled by the presiding judge for their flagrant abuse of Canada's Charter of Rights and Freedoms and failure to investigate or discipline lawyers who have, apparently, based on documentary evidence, engaged in criminal conduct.
This is especially so for Mr. Van Ommen and his law firm of McCarthy Tetrault that have historically been retained by the Law Society of British Columbia to silence whistleblower lawyers such as Jack Cram, Karl Eisbrenner and John Carten who have, in the public interest and in accordance with their duties as lawyers, exposed crimes by political insiders and their legal cronies.
The Law Society of British Columbia, McCarthy Tetrault and Herman Van Ommen are defendants in Federal Court Action, T-95-08, filed in Canada's Federal Court in January, 2008, where an astonishing nine (9) judges linked to the case have suddenly died - a statistically impossible co-incidence. Murder is suspected in at least some of the cases because each judge was in a position to blow the whistle on a "judicial mafia" that has operated inside Canada's court system.
There are a number of legal problems in BC and in Canada that pertain to the way in which justice is being seen to be done and that extends to all areas of financial interest to the people of the province and of Canada, that we can see clearly are not being addressed by anyone. Canada Revenue Agency is one in particular, where the TV shows are exposing the CRA employees for causing people of this country untold financial hardship because the government has recently changed (amended) the Criminal Code to permit these agents employed by CRA the right to apply to the Federal Court for orders without their targeted taxpayer being notified, and based upon what we see to be false and intentionally misleading information and denying the targeted taxpayer their Constitutionally guaranteed right to appear and defend and to present evidence to the contrary to what the CRA is claiming to be evidence of wrong doing or criminal offenses.
ReplyDeleteThere is also evidence that the Criminal Code is also amended to permit and privately owned bank in Canada holding a mortgage might also apply to a court without notice for an order permitting them to seize the property that they claim a mortgage interest, and there is undeniable evidence that these banks and their lawyers are filing misleading and absolute false information to the Courts in order to assure themselves that they might act to seize property belonging to Canadian citizens wrongly.
I understand that these problems with the Judiciary are on going since 2001? Why is it taking so long for closure?
As a Vancouver BC lawyer I feel like there is no point in appearing in court when you are already convicted. This was a smart move on his part.
ReplyDelete