The Water War Crimes are the the crimes carried out by political, legal, judicial and business insiders, in Canada, who attempted to swindle control of a bulk water export monopoly over the export of fresh water from Canada to the United States and Mexico, the subsequent viscious personal attack on British Columbia lawyer John Carten by the Governments of Canada and British Columbia because, as a lawyer, he was embarked on a path that would expose their crimes that included a dispicable criminal attack upon Ms. Karen Gibbs and her children because she was assisting Mr. Carten at the time.

From March 1, 2015, this blog will attempt to publish the ongoing posts on the New Developments page at the Water War Crimes web site. We attempted to do that in the past but missed a big chunk of time and hope to be able to keep it regular now that we have some extra time.

The Water War Crimes web site tells the story in great detail and we add updates because the case is unfolding.

The Canadian media will not report the story so we have used the internet to publicize the crimes by the insiders and the corruption in Canada's judicial, legal and political systems.

In the process, we have systematically destroyed many of our enemies but the governments of British Columbia and Canada continue to refuse a fair and equitable settlement and we continue our quest for redress in Canada's crooked court system and so more insiders are compromised and then murdered or mysteriously drop dead.

Twelve crooked judges involved were exposed as crooks and suddenly died. We think some of those judges were murdered. Six Chief Justices who manipulated the system against us were exposed and resigned, one was murdered and the other committed suicide.

Politicians, lawyers and civil servants who abused their positions of power were exposed, resigned or, suddenly, dropped dead. The death toll now stands at over forty and is likely to rise. The list of the sudden deaths linked to the Water War Crimes is published on the web site page entitled the Graveyard of the Guilty.

A remnant of the crooked political, judicial and legal insiders within the Governnments of Canada and British Columbia and some of Canada's most powerful law firms have effectively used their influence to manipulate Canada's judiciary to get the case thrown out without any hearing on its merits.

The insiders are desperate and periodically they lash out at Mr. Carten with illegal jailings, malicious prosecutions and other crooked legal tactics.

In February 2016, the Law Society of British Columbia commenced a vile attempt to destroy Mr. Carten again because he was helping some people who were victims of a criminal lawyer / judge gang operating in the courts.

This is a huge story that has been suppressed and mis-represented by the Canadian media and it continues to influence Canadian politics to this day.



Monday, January 18, 2010

Federal Court Chief Justice Lutfy Handed Hot Potato

We believe that an "officer" of the Federal Court committed a criminal act in a blatant attempt to obstruct justice in order to assist one of the parties to Federal Court Action T-95-08. We have two sworn affidavits that are in the court file attesting to the crime committed. A criminal act of obstruction of justice by an "Officer of the Court", if left unresolved, raises questions about the intergrity of Federal Court that go directly the authority of the Court itself.

We have advised the Court of our intention to file and serve a motion for contempt of court against Themis Program Management and Consulting Ltd. to be considered on January 25, 2010.

The following directions from Prothonotary Lafreniere indicate that the matter is now in the hands of Chief Justice Lutfy of the Federal Court of Canada. [CJ = Chief Justice]

Oral directions received from the Court: Roger Lafrenière, Esq., Prothonotary dated 18-JAN-2010 directing that further to the Order dated 11-APR-2008, no motions shall be served or accepted for filing pending disposition of the Plaintiffs' motion to appeal the Order (Lafrenière, P) 1-DEC-2009, unless leave is first sought & granted by the Court. The Registry is directed to forward the recent correspondence received from the parties to the Judicial Administrator for a determination by the CJ whether the Plaintiffs' appeal should be scheduled for an oral hearing or referred to a judge for disposition in writing placed on file on 18-JAN-2010 Confirmed in writing to the party(ies)

No comments:

Post a Comment